Comparison of tips in coaxial microincision cataract surgery with the …
본문
Comparison of tips in coaxial microincision cataract surgery
with the bevel-down technique.
J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37:2028–2033
J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37:2028–2033
동축 미세절개 백내장 수술의 팁과 bevel-down 기법의 비교
김은경 원장
김은경 원장

PURPOSE
To compare clinical and intraoperative parameters of 3 phaco tip designs
To compare clinical and intraoperative parameters of 3 phaco tip designs
in torsional phacoemulsification using the bevel-down technique.
METHODS
Consecutive cases were randomly assigned to have coaxial microincision cataract surgery using the mini-flared 30-degree Kelman tip,
mini-flared 45-degree Kelman tip, or reverse mini-flared 30-degree Kelman tip.
Clinical measurements included preoperative and 2-month postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity,
endothelial cell counts, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography and preoperative and
1-day postoperative central corneal thickness. Intraoperative measurements included cumulative dissipated energy (CDE)
and balanced salt solution use. Intraoperative video recording was used to visualize tip movements in the anterior chamber.
Consecutive cases were randomly assigned to have coaxial microincision cataract surgery using the mini-flared 30-degree Kelman tip,
mini-flared 45-degree Kelman tip, or reverse mini-flared 30-degree Kelman tip.
Clinical measurements included preoperative and 2-month postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity,
endothelial cell counts, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography and preoperative and
1-day postoperative central corneal thickness. Intraoperative measurements included cumulative dissipated energy (CDE)
and balanced salt solution use. Intraoperative video recording was used to visualize tip movements in the anterior chamber.
RESULTS
The study enrolled 302 eyes of 297 patients. Intraoperatively, there was less CDE use with the 45-degree Kelman tip
and reverse 30-degree Kelman tip than with the 30-degree Kelman tip (P<.05).
There were no statistically significant differences in any clinical parameter between the 3 tips.
Intraoperative films showed that the opening of the reverse 30-degree Kelman tip approached
the nucleus more easily than the opening of the other 2 tips.
The study enrolled 302 eyes of 297 patients. Intraoperatively, there was less CDE use with the 45-degree Kelman tip
and reverse 30-degree Kelman tip than with the 30-degree Kelman tip (P<.05).
There were no statistically significant differences in any clinical parameter between the 3 tips.
Intraoperative films showed that the opening of the reverse 30-degree Kelman tip approached
the nucleus more easily than the opening of the other 2 tips.
CONCLUSIONS
In torsional phacoemulsification through microincisions with the bevel-down technique,
the reverse mini-flared 0.9 mm 30-degree Kelman tip was as effective as the mini-flared 0.9 mm 45-degree Kelman tip
with regard to intraoperative characteristics, such as total energy use.
In torsional phacoemulsification through microincisions with the bevel-down technique,
the reverse mini-flared 0.9 mm 30-degree Kelman tip was as effective as the mini-flared 0.9 mm 45-degree Kelman tip
with regard to intraoperative characteristics, such as total energy use.


